In the evolving landscape of sports culture, the term ‘WAGs’ (wives and girlfriends of professional footballers) has often been synonymous with a life of luxury and high fashion. However, in Ireland, this stereotype is being challenged and reshaped. Irish WAGs are carving their own paths, showcasing a blend of ambition, professionalism, and individuality that goes far beyond the realms of Gucci and Prada. Empowerment and Career Ambitions among Irish WAGs In Ireland, the partners of professional footballers are breaking the mold. These empowered women are not content with being in the shadow of their famous partners; instead, they are pursuing successful careers in diverse fields. From design and fashion to healthcare and finance, Irish WAGs are setting new standards for personal achievement and independence. This shift highlights the changing perceptions and roles of footballer’s partners in Irish society. Challenging Stereotypes: The New Face of Irish Footballer’s Partners The traditional image of a footballer’s wife or girlfriend is undergoing a significant transformation in Ireland. The narrative is no longer limited to shopping sprees and glamorous parties. Instead, it’s about women who balance their personal aspirations with their roles as partners of sports personalities. This change is not just a trend but a reflection of the broader empowerment of women in Ireland. Diverse Career Paths of Modern Irish WAGs The article showcases several examples of Irish WAGs who have made names for themselves in various professional sectors. From innovative handbag designers to proficient pharmacists and savvy financial experts, these women are defining success on their own terms. Their stories serve as an inspiration, proving that being a partner of a professional athlete does not confine one to a singular lifestyle. Conclusion: A New Era for Irish WAGs The evolving role of WAGs in Ireland symbolizes a broader movement of gender equality and empowerment. These women are demonstrating that their identities and achievements are not tied solely to their partners’ fame. They are independent, successful, and multifaceted, contributing significantly to their fields and to Irish society. As role models, they are redefining what it means to be a partner of a professional footballer in today’s world.

‘So’ annoyed with the SO generation

By Barry Lord

So what is it with the word ‘So’ that gets up people’s noses?

Esteemed broadcasters and lovers of language such as John Humphries in the UK and our own Ryan Tubridy have in the past expressed their displeasure at what they view as misuse of this simple two-letter word in everyday conversation.

Maybe you’ve noticed it. It seems particularly virulent among millennials – that is, young men and women born in the late nineties/early noughties – who can’t seem to begin an answer to a question without first using the word so.

Example:
Me: What are your plans after the summer?

Millennial: So, I’m thinking of going to uni…

The worst offenders often sit in the ‘Red chair’ at the end of each episode of the Graham Norton Show; the people who tell their tales about comical mishaps that have befallen them.

Graham: Off you go with your story…
Millennial: So, I was on holiday and I got drunk and this happened…etc.

And regular listeners to Sean O’Rourke and Marian Finucane on RTE1 will attest to this verbal tic being employed by a number of their guests under the age of 25, like the three young female entrepreneurs O’Rourke interviewed recently.

Sean: How did you start the business?
Guest: So, we looked at the markets and we thought we should do this, etc.

I have to say it didn’t bother me initially, but now something has snapped and I’ve found myself in agreement with the ever growing and grumbling posse of language lovers who treat this word like an irritable earwig.

This may be a worrying sign that I’m entering the age of the curmudgeon a tad prematurely but, believe it or not, I am not some intransigent protector of the English language.

I like the way language evolves, the way certain colloquialisms can blend seamlessly into our everyday vocabulary and there are plenty of new words that can express a feeling or emotion more succinctly than some of those found in the Oxford English dictionary.

In fact, I have no problem with the word ‘so’ when used as an adjective. Wasn’t it Roseanne Barr who once famously told a writer on her show, ‘You are so fired!”?

UNITED STATES - FEBRUARY 02: ROSEANNE - "Friends & Relatives" 9/25/90 Tom Arnold, Roseanne Barr (Photo by ABC Photo Archives/ABC via Getty Images)
UNITED STATES – FEBRUARY 02: ROSEANNE – “Friends & Relatives” 9/25/90 Tom Arnold, Roseanne Barr (Photo by ABC Photo Archives/ABC via Getty Images)

However, I can find little justification for this new trend. If I was marking a Leaving Cert paper and a pupil began an answer with, “So, the 1916 Easter rising began because of…” even I, who can’t abide red pens, would be reaching for one in a second.

Very simply, if you wouldn’t write it down, why would you use it in speech?  Indeed why use it at all?

In a recent article in The Spectator, Dr Penelope Gardner-Chloros, of the department of applied linguistics and communication at Birkbeck College, explained that the ‘so’ phenomenon may be an indication of a need for acceptance.

‘We accommodate, and converge with, the group of people we want to belong to,” said Dr. Chloros.

“Someone using “so” like this may well be doing it because they’ve heard other people doing it. It spreads like the flu.’

Defenders of the word view it as a more favourable alternative to a pause or the uncertain “em” or “uh” used by a person/speaker not in total command of the topic they are discussing, or answering the question that has been put to them.

Those in PR see it as an effective way of ‘managing’ a conversation. I can think of a word for that but this is a family publication so I’ll refrain.

How do we deal with this then? Perhaps we can set an example. Make a protest. One that doesn’t involve throwing away your copy of Peter Gabriel’s So LP, or those oh-so-simple weight shakes.

‘So’ is a conjunction. It belongs in the middle of a sentence. Put it back in its rightful place and we can phase this annoying habit out for good.

In time millennials may follow our lead. But I’m not so sure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.  

‘Moonlight’ carries the burden of huge praise with grace.

By Barry Lord

Barry Jenkins’ Moonlight is another in that seemingly new category of film releases; the ready-to-eat, just-add-water-and-voila cinematic masterpiece destined for greatness and – with Oscar night drawing closer – gongs aplenty.

But this is problematic too.

Nowadays movies arrive on our shores laden with adulation from critics, screaming superlatives like ‘masterful’ and ‘majestic’ that duly adorn the posters and all before the paying public has had a chance to concur.

The only thing that suffers is the movie itself because it has so much to live up to.

Now Moonlight, through no fault of its own, has to go some way to merit at least one of these high compliments.

On first viewing, the film does not immediately shake the ground under your feet, nor does it tell you something about life that hasn’t already been learned through bitter experience.

But that is missing the point for Moonlight’s real power is in its subtlety.

The effortless way it evokes sympathy for the characters despite never asking for it. Its many lessons are delivered like a quiet reminder rather than a hectoring roar.

It’s ostensibly a rites of passage story told over three-time periods. Chiron (Alex R. Hibbert) runs into an abandoned apartment in Florida, seeking a hiding place from the neighbourhood bullies coming home from school.

He is rescued, in more than one sense, by Juan (Mahershala Ali) the local crack dealer, intrigued by this quiet, lonely little lad. Chiron has his troubles to seek.

His mother Paula (Naomie Harris) is hopelessly addicted to crack, leaving her young son to frequently come back to an empty home, at least when Mummy is not entertaining a new boyfriend/dealer or selling the TV (Chiron’s only comfort) to feed her addiction rather than her son.

 

The job of giving Chiron some semblance of a normal home life falls on Juan and his girlfriend Teresa (Janelle Monae) who manage to keep him on a relative straight and narrow path, until he reaches his adolescence where young Hibbert makes way for Ashton Sanders as the 16-year-old Chiron.

High school brings more harsh lessons about life and people, but also the beginning of Chiron’s sexual awakening.

In a short spell, Chiron has his first sexual encounter with his boisterous close friend Kevin (Jharell Jerome) and suffers a humiliating betrayal that ultimately leads to a descent into the criminal world that Juan had studiously tried to steer his young charge clear of.

Flash forward to adulthood and Chiron (now played by the adult Trevante Rhodes) adopts the sobriquet ‘Black’, moves to Atlanta and takes to the life of a drug dealer with verve and confidence. But one phone call, and an emotional reunion, chips away painfully at the façade he has carefully built for himself.

Director Jenkins – whose script is taken from a short story, In Moonlight Black Boys look Blue by Tarell Alvin McCraney – shows incredible assurance with the material in his possession and wrings terrific performances out of a cast – Harris apart- of unknowns.

There is no preaching, sanctimony or swelling orchestral score designed to elicit an emotional response. Here it is as much about what is unsaid rather than what is said; a glance or a flick of the eye says more than the best written soliloquy ever could.

The film is ultimately about the fragility of false identity and no amount of outward braggadocio can hide what dwells in the human heart. I may not be the demographic for this movie, but who hasn’t felt lost in the world and unsure about their role in it?

Who hasn’t felt alienated, dispossessed or abandoned?

Whether the film lives up to its exalted praise is up to those who buy a ticket, but it is a hugely rewarding piece of work – for me, far more accomplished than the vastly overpraised Boyhood (2015) – and indeed an important one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.